Friday, May 8, 2009
Do You Want One Of These Guys In YOUR Neighborhood?
If this administration gets it's way one just may be at your next BBQ!
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
Declining Great Lakes Levels Entirely Natural
By: Henry Payne
^Definition of Natural -
a: being in accordance with or determined by nature
b: having or constituting a classification based on features existing in nature
Detroit, Mich ~ May, 2008, Detroit News: “A report released by an environmental group warns that unless Congress acts to curb global warming, Great Lakes water levels will drop up to 3 feet; beaches will close more often, and fish and animal populations will decline.”
Never mind.
In a comprehensive, two-year study of Great Lakes water levels, Canadian and American researchers working for the International Joint Commission this week found Mother Nature was to blame. “It’s not ongoing. It has definitely stabilized,” said Ted Yuzyk, the Canadian co-chair of the study, who added the changes have reversed in the last two years anyway. “And it’s not human driven. This is more natural.”
“Record high levels were seen in the early 1950s, in 1973, and again in 1985-1986,” reads The International Upper Great Lakes Study. “In the late 1990s, a nearly 30-year period of above-average water level conditions in the upper Great Lakes ended. Since then, Lake Michigan-Huron and Lake Superior have experienced lower than average lake level conditions.”
Among the ^natural factors that explain the lakes cyclical rise and fall, reported the Detroit News, “were changing climate patterns, including greater rain and snow” and “shifts in the ’s crust, called glacial isostatic adjustment, that are the result of the planet's rebound from the melting of glaciers 10,000 years ago.”
Green groups were not amused. Facts are such inconvenient things.
^Definition of Natural -
a: being in accordance with or determined by nature
b: having or constituting a classification based on features existing in nature
Friday, May 1, 2009
Schumer Can't See 13 Million Jobless Americans In His Political Rush To Pass Amnesty (click for full story)
By Roy Beck, Friday, May 1, 2009
Did you think Senators might be too smart this year -- or too moral or at least too embarrassed -- to push for more foreign workers while millions of Americans are losing their jobs?
Such modest faith in U.S. Senators was dashed yesterday by the Senate Judiciary Committee in a first hearing of its immigration panel.
Senators made it clear that they are hopeful that the American people will let them pass the amnesty this year that was blocked in 2007.
And the Senators made it clear that the only thing that will stop the Senate from passing an amnesty for illegal foreign workers this year is if regular citizens like you mount immediate and sustained protests.
They said they really think Americans have become resigned to an amnesty.
ROY BECK is Founder & CEO of NumbersUSA
Did you think Senators might be too smart this year -- or too moral or at least too embarrassed -- to push for more foreign workers while millions of Americans are losing their jobs?
Such modest faith in U.S. Senators was dashed yesterday by the Senate Judiciary Committee in a first hearing of its immigration panel.
Senators made it clear that they are hopeful that the American people will let them pass the amnesty this year that was blocked in 2007.
And the Senators made it clear that the only thing that will stop the Senate from passing an amnesty for illegal foreign workers this year is if regular citizens like you mount immediate and sustained protests.
They said they really think Americans have become resigned to an amnesty.
ROY BECK is Founder & CEO of NumbersUSA
Saturday, April 25, 2009
Now We're Opening Up Top Secrets?
I usually talk about policy facts but this is over the pale and needs to be addressed. Obama promised transparency. He failed to say it would be of the previous administration and not of himself.
This sets precedence for any future administration, CIA or FBI agents to face possible criminal charges if their decisions during their rein aren't approved by their successor. The people making these important decisions on whether to go to war or simply confront our enemy in any way is always going to be compromised in fear of being punished later for it. Never in history has this EVER happened.
President Bush was a gentleman. Even tho he was urged to look into matters done in the previous administration he respected the duties, authority, and decisions of Mr. Clinton. President Bush looked forward, not backwards. President Bush DID NOT look for excuses in Mr. Clinton. President Bush was NOT a puppet for special interests.
Regardless of what one may think of President Bush, and he made his mistakes too, he kept us safe. He kept the enemy OFF our soil. They waged war on US and President Bush took it back to them on THEIR land. Absolutely NOTHING else is going to matter if our enemy wins. They just have to be right once. We have to be right 100% of the time.
This new administration has an agenda unlike any we've seen. He's Pelosi's puppet for her little vengeful acts against the previous administration. He's Soros's, the unions, and any extreme leftist's puppet for getting him elected. If he doesn't destroy us with the economy our enemies were just given an open door to come in and finish the job.
May God save our souls.
This sets precedence for any future administration, CIA or FBI agents to face possible criminal charges if their decisions during their rein aren't approved by their successor. The people making these important decisions on whether to go to war or simply confront our enemy in any way is always going to be compromised in fear of being punished later for it. Never in history has this EVER happened.
President Bush was a gentleman. Even tho he was urged to look into matters done in the previous administration he respected the duties, authority, and decisions of Mr. Clinton. President Bush looked forward, not backwards. President Bush DID NOT look for excuses in Mr. Clinton. President Bush was NOT a puppet for special interests.
Regardless of what one may think of President Bush, and he made his mistakes too, he kept us safe. He kept the enemy OFF our soil. They waged war on US and President Bush took it back to them on THEIR land. Absolutely NOTHING else is going to matter if our enemy wins. They just have to be right once. We have to be right 100% of the time.
This new administration has an agenda unlike any we've seen. He's Pelosi's puppet for her little vengeful acts against the previous administration. He's Soros's, the unions, and any extreme leftist's puppet for getting him elected. If he doesn't destroy us with the economy our enemies were just given an open door to come in and finish the job.
May God save our souls.
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
How Would You Assess President Obama’s Performance? (click for survey)
By The Heritage Foundation
How would you assess President Obama’s performance? How would you rate his economic policies, his national security decisions, his energy policies, his method of governing, and his overall agenda?
Today, conservatives face what may be their greatest obstacle -- the Obama agenda.
By cloaking his domestic agenda in terms of economic recovery, President Obama and his team of liberals have been able to pass the largest spending bill in history, repeal welfare reform, set us on the course to socialized healthcare, advance a very costly energy policy, impose high costs on productive people, and enact unprecedented expansions of governmental power.
Furthermore, by cutting the defense budget and ordering the closing of the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, the President demonstrates his complacency toward national security and undermines our ability to respond to future attacks.
This must stop.
How would you assess President Obama’s performance? How would you rate his economic policies, his national security decisions, his energy policies, his method of governing, and his overall agenda?
Today, conservatives face what may be their greatest obstacle -- the Obama agenda.
By cloaking his domestic agenda in terms of economic recovery, President Obama and his team of liberals have been able to pass the largest spending bill in history, repeal welfare reform, set us on the course to socialized healthcare, advance a very costly energy policy, impose high costs on productive people, and enact unprecedented expansions of governmental power.
Furthermore, by cutting the defense budget and ordering the closing of the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, the President demonstrates his complacency toward national security and undermines our ability to respond to future attacks.
This must stop.
Saturday, April 18, 2009
President Obama Announces Support for Firearms Treaty (click for additional stories)
From the NRA
During an official visit to Mexico on April 16, President Obama announced his support for Senate ratification of an inter-American treaty on firearms trafficking. In response, NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre and NRA-ILA Executive Director Chris Cox issued the following statement:
"The NRA is well aware of the proposed Organization of American States treaty on firearms trafficking, known by its Spanish initials as CIFTA. The NRA monitored the development of this treaty from its earliest days, but contrary to news reports today, the NRA did not 'participate' at the meeting where the treaty was approved.
"The treaty does include language suggesting that it is not intended to restrict 'lawful ownership and use' of firearms. Despite those words, the NRA knows that anti-gun advocates will still try to use this treaty to attack gun ownership in the U.S. Therefore, the NRA will continue to vigorously oppose any international effort to restrict the constitutional rights of law-abiding American gun owners."
During an official visit to Mexico on April 16, President Obama announced his support for Senate ratification of an inter-American treaty on firearms trafficking. In response, NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre and NRA-ILA Executive Director Chris Cox issued the following statement:
"The NRA is well aware of the proposed Organization of American States treaty on firearms trafficking, known by its Spanish initials as CIFTA. The NRA monitored the development of this treaty from its earliest days, but contrary to news reports today, the NRA did not 'participate' at the meeting where the treaty was approved.
"The treaty does include language suggesting that it is not intended to restrict 'lawful ownership and use' of firearms. Despite those words, the NRA knows that anti-gun advocates will still try to use this treaty to attack gun ownership in the U.S. Therefore, the NRA will continue to vigorously oppose any international effort to restrict the constitutional rights of law-abiding American gun owners."
Friday, April 17, 2009
The Thomas More Law Center (Ann Arbor, MI) and Michael Savage Sue Janet Napolitano (click for full story and suit)
By Bob Unruh
WorldNetDaily
"ANN ARBOR, MI – The Thomas More Law Center, a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, announced that yesterday evening it filed a federal lawsuit against Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano. The lawsuit claims that her Department’s “Rightwing Extremism Policy,” as reflected in the recently publicized Intelligence Assessment, “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment,” violates the civil liberties of combat veterans as well as American citizens by targeting them for disfavored treatment on account of their political beliefs."
WorldNetDaily
"ANN ARBOR, MI – The Thomas More Law Center, a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, announced that yesterday evening it filed a federal lawsuit against Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano. The lawsuit claims that her Department’s “Rightwing Extremism Policy,” as reflected in the recently publicized Intelligence Assessment, “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment,” violates the civil liberties of combat veterans as well as American citizens by targeting them for disfavored treatment on account of their political beliefs."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
